How cool that you have enabled comments. Love the stack and a happy paid subscriber. I really hope you will write about the raging debates and massive uncertainty whether or not particular educators are even allowed to use detectors and if they do whether they can use that as a piece of evidence when challenging student work that appears 100% GAI. My own unversity has conflicting policies and instructors are loosing their minds because they have no idea what is allowed. My cite the widely cited turn-offs of Turnitin's detector but that does not mean that those schools have "banned" detectors. I see pros and cons but I think we are doing instructors a disservice by not having a clear policy in this crucial regard
Nice work on the top 10 (some heavy weights on that list...)
If the Aussies are interested in cribbing some additional sites to block, they may like the list of over 330 that are in the Essay Mill Database https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LTeZI1rILqBdAZCBqMSqU4SSZLr2yE3x6KEJgYo7z-w/edit?usp=sharing
How cool that you have enabled comments. Love the stack and a happy paid subscriber. I really hope you will write about the raging debates and massive uncertainty whether or not particular educators are even allowed to use detectors and if they do whether they can use that as a piece of evidence when challenging student work that appears 100% GAI. My own unversity has conflicting policies and instructors are loosing their minds because they have no idea what is allowed. My cite the widely cited turn-offs of Turnitin's detector but that does not mean that those schools have "banned" detectors. I see pros and cons but I think we are doing instructors a disservice by not having a clear policy in this crucial regard